|
|
|
|
|
Pedro Neves, Salomé Pires, Carlos Miguel Marto, Inês Amaro, Ana Coelho, José Sousa, Manuel Marques Ferreira, Maria Filomena Botelho, Eunice Carrilho, Ana Margarida Abrantes and Anabela Baptista Paula
Hybrid bioactive composite resins combine the benefits of glass ionomer cements with composite resins. Its self-adhesiveness is achieved through functional polyacrylic acids and carboxylic groups, hybridizing the smear layer and establishing ionic intera...
ver más
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hyun-Jung Kim
The aim of this study was a comparison of the micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin and microleakage of in vitro class V restorations of three different ion-releasing restorative materials under various pH conditions: giomer, a resin-modified glas...
ver más
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diana Banu? One?, Lucian Barbu Tudoran, Ada Gabriela Delean, Petra ?urlin, Andreea Ciurea, Alexandra Roman, Sorana D. Bolboaca, Cristina Gasparik, Alexandrina Muntean and Andrada Soanca
The resin composite restoration of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) still faces some drawbacks mostly related to the quality of the marginal seal. This study attempts to evaluate the adhesive capacities of two flowable and two conventional hybrid res...
ver más
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrea Maria Chisnoiu, Marioara Moldovan, Codruta Sarosi, Radu Marcel Chisnoiu, Doina Iulia Rotaru, Ada Gabriela Delean, Ovidiu Pastrav, Alexandrina Muntean, Ioan Petean, Lucian Barbu Tudoran and Mihaela Pastrav
Do the new, modern dental resin composites improve the sealing in cavities restorations? The present study was designed to compare the effect of two different, but most used layering techniques of the dental composite in reducing the marginal microleakag...
ver más
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simonetta D?Ercole, Tatiane Cristina Dotta, Giovanna Iezzi, Alessandro Cipollina, Vinicius Pedrazzi, Adriano Piattelli and Morena Petrini
This in vitro study aims to evaluate the bacterial microleakage of three conometric connections. Sixty dental implants (3P implafavourite Scalenghe) were divided in groups (n = 20): Cone?Morse with passing screw (Group 1); Cone?Morse with solid abutment ...
ver más
|
|
|
|
|
|