Resumen
During the COVID-19 pandemic, reusable masks became ubiquitous; these masks were made from various fabrics without guidance from the research community or regulating agencies. Though reusable masks reduce the waste stream associated with disposable masks and promote the use of masks by the population, their efficacy in preventing the transmission of infectious agents has not been evaluated sufficiently. Among the unknowns is the effect of relative humidity (RH) on fabrics? filtration efficiency (FE) and breathability. This study evaluates the FE and breathability of several readily accessible mask materials in an aerosol chamber. Sodium chloride aerosols were used as the challenge aerosol with aerodynamic particle diameter in the 0.5 to 2.5 µm range. To mimic the variability in RH in the environment and the exhaled-breath condition, the chamber was operated at RH of 30% to 70%. The face velocity was varied between 0.05 m/s and 0.19 m/s to simulate different breathing rates. The FE and pressure drop were used to determine the quality factor of the materials. Among the tested materials, the 3M P100 filter has the highest pressure drop of 140 Pa; the N95 mask and the 3M P100 have almost 100% FE for all sizes of particles and tested face velocities; the surgical mask has nearly 90% FE for all the particles and the lowest pressure drop among the certified materials, which ranks it the second to the N95 mask in the quality factor. Other material performance data are presented as a function of relative humidity and aerosol size. The quality factor for each material was compared against reference filtration media and surgical masks. Multiple layers of selected materials are also tested. While the additional layers improve FE, the pressure drop increases linearly. Additionally, the certified materials performed approximately three times better than the highest performing non-certified material.