Resumen
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has shown promising results in the control of macroscopic vascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, its efficacy in comparison to sorafenib when combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains to be determined. Between 2009 and 2017, 77 HCC patients with macroscopic vascular invasion receiving TACE?SBRT or TACE?sorafenib combination therapies were enrolled. The best treatment responses, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the two treatment arms were compared. Of the patients enrolled, 26 patients (33.8%) received TACE?SBRT treatment, and 51 (66.2%) received TACE?sorafenib treatment. The patients in the TACE?SBRT group were more frequently classified as elder in age (p = 0.012), having recurrent disease (p = 0.026), and showing lower rates of multiple hepatic lesions (p = 0.005) than patients in TACE?sorafenib group. After propensity score matching (PSM), 26 pairs of well-matched HCC patients were selected; patients in the TACE?SBRT group showed better overall response rates in trend compared to those in the TACE?sorafenib group. The hazard ratio (HR) of OS to PFS for the TACE?SBRT approach and the TACE?sorafenib approach was 0.36 (95% CI, 0.17?0.75; p = 0.007) and 0.35 (95% CI, 0.20?0.62; p < 0.001), respectively. For HCC patients with macrovascular invasion, TACE plus SBRT could provide improved OS and PFS compared to TACE?sorafenib therapy.